Thursday, May 21, 2009

One fair use for Waterboarding

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: To avoid what could be federal charges I would just like to state that I am in no way shape or form advocating that non-government entities or persons should kidnap or detain and then waterboard ANYONE. Now...if the CIA wanted to do it to the below mentioned people...who am I to argue with the heroes that keep us safe?

I've been thinking about this for a few weeks now, and while I oppose torture in almost all circumstances, there is one that seems like a reasonable, and appropriate use of such techniques as waterboarding and other "harsh interrogation procedures," that being, to waterboard all of the DOJ lawyers and Dick Cheney until such time as they admit that it is torture.

This would be a victory on two fronts and really is the only win-win situation ever devised with regards to the use of torture. As I see it, waterboarding these sorry sacks of shit provides two possible outcomes, both of which would be agreeable to me.

The first outcome, which is the most likely outcome in my opinion, is that they cop to waterboarding and other "harsh methods" as being torture. This proves that they lied in their memos and legal opinions, and, assuming we use the same legal standards that they have imposed on the detainees, would be sufficient evidence of their wrong doing. Also, if they later appear on television or in interviews arguing that they only said it was torture because they were being tortured, it further adds to the fact that information obtained through torture is unreliable.

The second outcome, and, I doubt that any of them have the Jack Bauer ability to resist torture for all that long, is that they don't give in and we get to waterboard Dick Cheney until the end of days (when he gets scooped up in the rapture). While this wouldn't be as fulfilling to the country's soul as the former, it's still a lot of fun to know that those who enacted these awful policies would be on the receiving end of them.

2 comments:

  1. This would make a great radio commentary (if you cleaned up the language a bit).

    ReplyDelete
  2. This advantage is the product of the games themselves and never set by particular person casinos. So would not matter what} or the place you choose to play, if you're betting on on line casino games, find a way to|you probably can}'t escape the house edge. Chemin de Fer is usually performed with six 52-card decks, sometimes with eight. The on line casino supplies a croupier who directs the play and takes a commission for the on line casino when the banker wins. The quantity of commission is determined by} the on line casino but is usually 5% of the amount received by the 온라인카지노 banker, sometimes much less.

    ReplyDelete

Copyright © by PutridPundits.com. All rights reserved.